Pecking Order or Trade-off Hypothesis
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this paper we test the pecking order and trade-off hypotheses of corporate financing decisions using a cross-section of the largest Chinese listed companies. We build on Allen (1993) and Baskin (1989) to set up three models in which trade-off and pecking order theories give distinctively different predictions: (1) the determinants of leverage, (2) the relationship between leverage and dividends, and (3) the determinants of corporate investment. In model (1), we find a significant negative correlation between leverage and profitability; in model (2) we find a significant positive correlation between current leverage and past dividends. These results broadly support the pecking order hypothesis over trade-off theory. However, model (3) is inconclusive. Overall, the results provide tentative support for the pecking order hypothesis and demonstrate that a conventional model of corporate capital structure can explain the financing behaviour of Chinese companies. Correspondence to: Guanqun Tong, Department of Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0) 1509 222718; Fax: +44 (0) 1509 223910; E-mail:[email protected] † This paper is based on and extends Guanqun Tong’s MSc Dissertation at Loughborough University (Tong 2003). We thank participants in the 2004 EEFS Conference in Gdansk for their helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. © Guanqun Tong and Christopher J. Green 2004 All Rights Reserved
منابع مشابه
Some Determinants of Corporate Financing Decisions: Evidence from the Listed Companies in Tehran Stock Exchange
The aim of this empirical study is to explore the trade-off model and pecking order model of capital structure. The investigation is performed using panel data procedures for a sample of 76 firms listed in Tehran Stock Exchange during 2007-2010.The study employs OLS regression model in examining the capital structure of firms in Iran. The study employs variables reflecting differing theoretical...
متن کاملFinancing Investment: A New Test of Capital Structure
We study the financing patterns of large and indivisible projects – arguably the main focus of capital structure theory – by developing a filter that identifies investment spikes in a large population of firms. Consistent with the pecking-order theory we find that projects are predominantly financed with debt, particularly in large and profitable firms. However, we reject the hypothesis that in...
متن کاملA New Test of Capital Structure
We report results of a new test of the financing of large and indivisible projects – arguably the focus of most capital structure theory. We develop a filter that identifies investment spikes in a large population of firms. Consistent with the pecking-order theory we find that projects are predominantly financed with debt, particularly in large and profitable firms. However, we reject the hypot...
متن کاملTrade Liberalization and Financial Leverage
This paper argues that trade liberalization has a potentially significant impact on financial leverage. We compare the predictions of the trade-off model of capital structure with the pecking order model. In the first case, we suggest that trade liberalization affects the trade-off between the tax advantages of debt and expected bankruptcy costs. This implies that a reduction in domestic tariff...
متن کاملSouth African Capital Structure Decisions: A Survey of Listed Companies
This paper explores the factors that influence capital structure decisions in South Africa from the perspective of the Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The results of a survey of 33 CFOs of JSE listed companies find that South African CFOs are equally likely to follow the Pecking Order or Static Trade-Off theories. However, smaller companies are more likely to follow the Pecking Order theory whil...
متن کامل